Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Pablo Picasso’s “Guernica” may leave Madrid for the first time in more than 30 years. https://ift.tt/ocD8E7k

Pablo Picasso’s Guernica (1937), considered one of the Spanish artist’s masterpieces, might travel to the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao in 2026. This week, Catalan-language newspaper Ara reported that the Basque regional government petitioned Spain’s Ministry of Culture to authorize a loan for the painting, to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the bombing of Guernica, or in Basque, Gernika. If approved, it would be the first time the painting has left Museo Reina Sofía in Madrid since 1992.

The Basque government’s proposal calls for Guernica to be on view at the Guggenheim from October 2026 to June 2027. The head of the regional government, Imanol Pradales, told Ara that featuring the painting would act as “a formula for symbolic reparation and historical memory” for the Basque people. Meanwhile, the Basque leader underscored that it would be a “message to the world” about “what war entails and the atrocity that derives from dictatorships.”

Picasso painted Guernica in 1937 following the Nazi and Italian fascist bombing of the Basque city; Spanish Nationalist general Francisco Franco requested the offensive from his allies during the Spanish Civil War. The 11-by-25-foot canvas is a vehement anti-war statement. It captures the horrors of the bombing as it depicts screaming figures and fractured animals in the artist’s signature Cubist style. Picasso unveiled the painting at the World’s Fair that same year. It then lived in the Museum of Modern Art from 1939 to 1981, as Picasso requested that the painting not return to Spain until Franco’s dictatorship ended. Before it was housed at the Reina Sofía, the painting hung at the Prado Museum for 11 years.

Guggenheim Museum Bilbao requested the painting to be moved once before, in 1997, for its opening. Additionally, Barcelona’s municipal government once asked for its transfer. However, the museum has repeatedly refused to move the painting. Last Thursday, the Reina Sofia released a statement about conservation concerns, noting that transferring is “strongly discouraged,” as reported by Ara.

The Guernica transfer request carries political undertones. Two Basque nationalist parties have raised the Guernica move with the Spanish government. Both parties support Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s current administration; the politician might lose crucial votes if he does not support their campaign. Basque government councilor Ibone Bengoetxea told Ara that the decision is “not technical” but rather a “political decision.”



from Artsy News https://ift.tt/TNE2VwA

How Latinx Artists Are Redefining Contemporary American Painting https://ift.tt/sb8mKoZ

The group exhibition “Let Us Gather in a Flourishing Way,” on view at the Buffalo AKG Art Museum in Buffalo, New York, through September 6th, explores how contemporary Latinx artists have reshaped and subverted traditional painting genres in recent years. Their aesthetic innovations respond to shifting cultural narratives, government policies that demonize the Latinx diaspora, and their long exclusion from mainstream art history.

The show features 58 artists who approach painting as a flexible language. Some challenge the boundaries of the medium through unexpected materials, while others take distinct approaches to European traditions like landscape, portraiture, and still life. The exhibition will travel to the Des Moines Art Center, the Museum of Contemporary Art Denver, the Phoenix Art Museum, and the Frye Art Museum in Seattle.

A bold new survey of Latinx painting

The curator, Andrea Alvarez, who has previously curated Latinx-focused shows like “Comunidades Visibles: The Materiality of Migration” from 2021, calls the exhibition the “boldest statement” of her career. “It is a declaration that we as Latinx people are here, that we take up space, that we are part of the dialogue of what is happening in contemporary art and in the contemporary world, and that it merits attention,” she said during the preview of the show. “More broadly, it means that all those individuals who have experienced displacement, who have migrated around the world, whose worldviews are shaped by those experiences, also deserve to be seen and represented in spaces like these.”

Alvarez emphasizes that the show is not a survey but aims to “think about Latinx painting in expansive ways,” and to “expand the disciplines that have been inherited and passed down to us from the European and white American traditions.” The exhibition is split into thematic sections, although many of the works could easily move between them. The paintings all fall under what Alvarez calls Pinturx, or the “Latinx lens” on “traditional, European-approved” genres of painting. The Chicano poet Juan Felipe Herrera, whose 2008 poem gives the exhibition its title, wrote an epic 68-page poem in response to the show that is excerpted throughout the galleries as a conceptual guide.

In line with Alvarez’s expansive curatorial approach, some of the included artworks are not paintings at all. Some reimagine folk and craft traditions, like Justin Favela’s St. Maarten (1972), After Marisol (2025–26), a mural made with the colored tissue paper often used to make piñatas. The piece references a seascape by the Venezuelan American artist Marisol, who features prominently in the museum’s collection. It continues Favela’s decades-long exploration of the piñata style, which he began as a student in protest of his professors urging him to make work about his Mexican Guatemalan heritage.

“No one else was being asked to do that,” Favela said. “I thought to make a symbol representing Latinidad that would be so corny they would think I was making fun of the art world. But the piñata has so many layers—it’s about celebration, it’s about destruction. It automatically ties into Latino culture in the United States and everybody understands what that symbol means.” He added that the inclusion of the work in a prestigious institution is also significant, since “a lot of gallerists and professors told me I would never get into museums using tissue paper.”

Political themes in Latinx painting

Some paintings in the exhibition address the plight of migrants crossing the United States border. Karla Diaz’s Uncle’s Crossing (2022) depicts the artist’s late uncle, who worked as a coyote, or someone paid to bring migrants across the U.S.-Mexico border. The work comes from her “Coyote” series, which Diaz says she began after her uncle’s death, as his profession, and the possible legal ramifications of speaking out about it, was a taboo subject in her household.

Other works deal with how the Latinx diaspora assimilates, like Guadalupe Maravilla’s Pupusa Retablo (2023), in which a small retablo, or devotional painting, framed by found objects, illustrates the artist’s migration from El Salvador to the United States in the 1980s. At eight years old, Maravilla traveled alone to the Texas border as he fled the Salvadoran Civil War. His vignette recounts an episode in Honduras when a woman flagged him as a migrant for eating pupusas with his hands rather than a fork and knife, as is the custom in the region. He feared he’d be sent back.

Some works consider the effects of imperialism and the exploitation of people and nature. Gamaliel Rodríguez’s painting Evolved Cavendish (2022) speaks to the slave trade in the Caribbean. Its subject is a rotting cavendish banana tree, a high-carb crop brought to Puerto Rico under Spanish colonial rule to feed enslaved people. Rodríguez uses the plant, which appears to be consumed with fungus, to draw parallels to Spanish colonization and consider how Puerto Rico has “changed and evolved” over the centuries, the artist said.

In addition, Angel Otero addresses the effects of climate change on Latinx communities in the large-scale painting Constellation (2024), which shows his grandmother’s couch suspended on a swing set and submerged in waves. The piece critiques the United States’s response to the widely destructive Hurricane Maria and the “ways in which memories and cultural heritage can be washed away by natural disasters,” Alvarez said.

Other works have socioeconomic undertones, like Kristopher Raos’s hard-edge painting Untitled (No Escaping the Housework, All Temperature!) (2023), which depicts fragments of a detergent box painted in geometric color fields, reflecting on the visual markings of domestic labor in Latinx communities with a Pop art–like quality. Raos likens the “methodical process of labor” to artistic process. No one can “conceptualize how much goes into a work,” he said.

Alfonso Gonzalez Jr, a self-taught artist who previously worked as a commercial billboard painter, presents the striking Abogados Tierra Caliente (Billboard) (2024), a work mounted on a steel post in the style of a billboard. It reflects ads he saw in East Los Angeles for service providers like insurance companies and injury lawyers that very blatantly conveyed Latinx tropes and targeted Latinx communities.

Buffalo AKG’s monumental commission and more intimate work

rafa esparza’s monumental Tratos (2025–26), commissioned specifically for the exhibition, is a six-panel painting on adobe blocks that is supported by a steel armature. On the back, the artist has created an assemblage that partly comprises a mangled American flag and laid adobe blocks on the floor.

The central image references a photograph of the 1997 Acteal massacre in Chiapas, Mexico, showing Indigenous women confronting soldiers. esparza adds collaged elements of ICE raids in Los Angeles and Chicago, drawing parallels between the atrocities. The figures’ arms are tattooed with symbols showing images like the Florentine Codex, a 16th-century manuscript documenting the culture and religion of the Aztec in early colonial Mexico, the Aztecs fleeing from Spaniards, and other scenes.

“I was thinking about drawing a painting showing a continuum of violence that’s colonial [and] that comes from globalization,” esparza said. “The look on the soldier’s face—a mortified look—said so much that I couldn’t draw a better expression. I was interested not only in state-sanctioned agreements but also in the personal agreements we make with one another as community members [and] people who care for each other. That image carries a lot of betrayal. There’s a heavy tension.”

Other works speak to the power of family and community, like Larry Madrigal’s Man on Trampoline (2023), which depicts an everyday scene rendered with the grandeur of Old Masters paintings. Madrigal’s figures ascend in midair and frenetically topple over one another as they conjure the balance and chaos of family life. The work references El Greco’s Resurrection (circa 1596–1600) to “amplify this sense of epic importance” that, at the same time, was “just a moment of play,” he said. Madrigal moved from Los Angeles to Phoenix as a child, where he said the cookie-cutter houses that stretched across the Southwestern landscape could have felt alienating were it not for his family’s deep bond and their connections with Latinx culture and community.

The complicated meaning of “Latinx”

In the process of organizing this sweeping exhibition, Alvarez acknowledged that the term “Latinx” has been widely contested and misunderstood since it was introduced in the early 2000s as a gender-neutral alternative. Some argue that it does not fit naturally in Spanish and that it imposes U.S. cultural politics on Spanish-speaking communities. Alvarez ultimately decided to use the term because it is widely accepted by Latin American art scholars at the moment, and language is ever-evolving.

“We use [Latinx] knowing that we stand on unstable ground as we use it,” she said. “And we, in some ways, are building the plane as we fly it. We use it as we critique it. We understand its complexities and the fraught histories that it carries with it, while also knowing its power and its ability to create a path forward, or forge a space for people. At this moment, we have not identified a better word. We use it knowing that it’s what we have, and we use it responsibly.”

Beyond their categorization as “Latinx artists,” the artists in this exhibition are united by a “deep sense of care and attention toward their work, toward their communities, and toward the histories they are engaging with,” Alvarez said. “Every gesture, every material choice, every word that they use when they talk about their work is not taken lightly. That’s very much shared across the board and something we can learn from.”

Browse more artworks from our Contemporary Latinx Voices collection.



from Artsy News https://ift.tt/sj4IK3m

$17.6M Joan Mitchell painting breaks woman artist auction record in Asia. https://ift.tt/Yd29Gmc

A masterful tableau by American painter Joan Mitchell sold for HK$137.4 million ($17.6 million) at Sotheby’s modern and contemporary evening sale in Hong Kong on Sunday, March 29. The sale marks the top lot sold across the Hong Kong spring auctions in Hong Kong at Sotheby’s, Christie’s, and Phillips, and is the most expensive work by a woman artist sold at auction in Asia. All prices include fees.

The painting, La Grande Vallée VII (1983), sold a few hairs above its low estimate of HK$110 million ($14.3 million) to an online bidder. It last sold at Christie’s in New York in July 2020 for $14.5 million, just below its high estimate of $15 million.

La Grande Vallée VII is a part of the artist’s series of the same name; a suite of 21 works executed in breathtaking succession between 1983 and 1984. Mitchell’s “Grande Vallée” series is considered one of her most celebrated bodies of work. It was produced at the apex of her career and is indicative of her signature style, which is marked by short, frenetic brush strokes and vivid hues. Mitchell made the works in response to memories a friend’s cousin relayed to her shortly before their death of a childhood spent in the idyllic French countryside. The artist had also lost her own sister recently before, and thus painted what she conceived of as a grand, sunlit valley that would allow for joy and grief to intertwine with rich color.


March 2026 marked the first time that Sotheby’s, Christie’s, and Phillips aligned their auction calendars in Hong Kong, which all took place during Hong Kong Art Week. At Christie’s, their spring 20th/21st century spring auctions realized a total of HK$886.9 million ($113.4 million), and a 100 percent sell-through rate. Top lots of that sale include Gerhard Richter’s Abstraktes Bild (1991), which sold for HK$92.1 million ($11.8 million), and Cheval agenouillé sur un tapis (circa 1950s–60s) by Sanyu (Changyu), which more than doubled its low estimate and sold for HK$63.9 million ($8.2 million).

Meanwhile, a world auction record was achieved for the late German painter Walter Spies, whose Blick von der höhe (A view from the heights) (1934), sold for HK$59.06 million ($7.5 million).

At Phillip’s, their evening and modern & contemporary art sales totaled HK$88.6 million ($11.3 million), which was 30% above the sales’ total high estimate. Top lots from their spring auctions include Liu Dan’s Dictionary (2011), which set a new auction record for the artist and sold for HK$11.5 million ($1.5 million); Bloodline Series – Father and Daughter (2005), by Zhang Xiaogang, which sold for HK$6.7 million ($856,612); and Yayoi Kusama’s Sunset Afterglow inside My Heart (2020), which sold for HK$6.5 million ($823,665).

Following Mitchell’s La Grande Vallée VII, the most expensive lots across the three sales overall are as follows:

  • Gerhard Richter’s Abstraktes Bild (1991) sold for HK$92.1 million ($11.8 million) at Christie’s.
  • Mark Rothko’s No. 10 (1949) sold for HK$66.8 million ($8.5 million) at Sotheby’s.
  • Sanyu (Changyu)’s Cheval agenouillé sur un tapis (circa 1950s–60s) sold for HK$63.9 million ($8.2 million) at Christie’s.
  • Walter Spies’s Blick von der höhe (A view from the heights) (1934) sold for HK$59.06 million ($7.5 million) at Christie’s.
  • Yayoi Kusama’s Pumpkin (2015) sold for HK$49.7 million ($6.34 million) at Sotheby’s.


from Artsy News https://ift.tt/FCS2JY4

Legendary Auctioneer Jussi Pylkkänen on How to Decode Auction Numbers https://ift.tt/3WHs4Gn

The art market is in a period of transition. 2024 was a difficult year for auction houses, followed by a slow but sure recovery in 2025. Collectors with works to sell have gradually begun to readjust their expectations, but the auction houses are under pressure to deliver results.

As a consequence, all buyers at auction need to think smartly about the value of the works being sold at auction and carefully review sources such as estimates quoted by auction houses.

Here, I share some notes to keep in mind when bidding in auctions and interpreting sales.


Auction estimates reflect sellers, not the market

An auction estimate is a negotiated price range—part market signal, part sales strategy—intended to guide bidding. It is usually set as a low-to-high range.

In practice, estimates anchor expectations in the room, influence where bidding begins, and can be used to create momentum or confidence. Crucially, however, they should never be mistaken for an objective or fixed measure of what an artwork is truly worth.

In my career as an auctioneer, I always believed that conservative estimates generated the highest level of competition and prices. A perfect example of this was Sotheby’s very sensible approach to estimates for their hugely successful Pauline Karpidas sale in London last September, which was 100 percent sold and made $136 million against a pre-sale estimate of $80 million. One could argue that this sale—and the auction house’s wise estimating approach—kick-started the current confidence in the global art market.

Still, collectors need to be particularly wary of works reappearing less than five years after their purchase. This could signal that the buyer is looking to recoup their costs in a market that may have fallen by as much as 20 percent in recent years.

Add in buyers’ premiums—an additional percentage fee paid by the buyer on the winning hammer price of an auction lot—and estimates can drift upward to bridge the gap.

The simple answer is to do your homework before you bid. Seek specialist, expert advice, and also look for market information from transparent data sources.


Be wary of how competition creates optimism

Over the past decade, competition for major consignments among the leading auction houses has intensified. This has pushed some estimates higher at the top of the market, particularly for the rarest objects in major collections.

While some pricing has corrected by as much as 20 percent, some areas are still out of step. Certain established early 20th-century artists, such as Fernand Léger, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Alexej von Jawlensky, and Maurice de Vlaminck, alongside post-war and younger artists whose works surged in price between 2020 and 2023, are still recalibrating.

Each sale leads to readjustments, but it takes time for owners to adjust their expectations in line with these new price levels. Be patient, monitor the markets and, most importantly of all, trust your judgement.


Understanding the impact of auction guarantees on estimates

Guarantees—minimum prices promised to sellers by auction houses—have become more common as competition between the auction houses has increased and sellers have lost confidence in current pricing levels.

This tends to support strong estimates for top lots in the tentpole evening sales, where risk is concentrated. Day sales, designed to encourage competition and high sell-through rates, can offer greater opportunities for bidders.

The same applies to estate sales, where, once the headline works have performed, the remainder can be overlooked and underpriced. In an estate sale like the recent Roger and Josette Vanthournout collection auction at Christie’s London, for instance, more flexibility is allowed on reserves. When the evening sale goes well, an auctioneer can start bidding for these works at much more reasonable levels—often, very good buys can be made at the tail end of major collection sales.

A patient buyer can often find a bargain.


How to use price data without being misled

Today’s art buyers have unprecedented access to data. In days gone by, collectors had to rely on unillustrated Mayer price guides. Today, visuals, auction records and comparative descriptions are available at the click of a button.

But more information does not always mean clearer judgment.

Outlier prices—especially those from major collection sales—can distort perception. There are plenty of examples of works achieving breakaway prices which are rarely matched in the decade that follows. Great collection sales can generate incredible prices for individual works, as the discerning eye of a storied collector casts a spell over the market. We have witnessed this effect in the collections of David Rockefeller, Si Newhouse, Paul Allen and, more recently, Leonard Lauder.

Great provenance equals great prices. Be wary of tying your expectations to top prices paid for artists like Henri Matisse, Claude Monet, Pablo Picasso, Lucian Freud or Gustav Klimt achieved in these contexts. It would be unwise to skew your judgement as you bid for other works by these artists—or draw conclusions about the general health of the art market. These are special auctions, in which the general rule is often broken.

World records are more regularly achieved in these magical sales than in any others. Provenance can elevate value dramatically—and temporarily.

Some key tips on bidding at auction

Start early

When auctioneering, I try to allow opening bids to come in below the low estimate, even if the reserve, or minimum, is set higher.

This allows strong bidders to engage early with the auctioneer and dictate the pace, which is often highly advantageous. An experienced auctioneer will continue to take bids from this opening bidder until they drop out or win the object.

So I suggest bidding first. Resist the temptation to watch and wait; in my experience, playing a waiting game at auction rarely works. Imagine being a sports team that allows the opposition to score first then has to fight a rearguard action. Psychologically, too, getting in early, giving an object your best shot, and losing it is much better than suffering the disappointment of not even raising your hand. Be bold, show strength, bid with purpose and—if it does happen—lose with grace.

Trust your number, not the estimate

Auctioning is a gladiatorial sport, and there is only ever one winner. Follow your plan and be prepared to put in an extra bid to see off the competition.

As an advisor, I have frequently bought objects for less than I expected simply because I was not pushed to my client’s maximum price. Often, when you see high prices paid against estimates, it is for the very best works in the sale. This was certainly the case in the London auctions earlier this month: the majority of works sold around the low estimates in the evening sales, while the much-publicized 20 percent that sold above estimate were the best works in the auction.

Take comfort in the fact that if someone else is bidding well above the estimate, their involvement validates your judgment in going higher. In future years, nobody will care where the presale estimate was set. Pay if you believe in the work.

Control the pace

Bear in mind that, as a bidder, you are not obliged to follow the auctioneer’s increments—or the published estimate.

Bold bidding and larger increments can dissuade or intimidate your opposition.

In the case of Leonardo da Vinci’s Salvator Mundi (1499–1500)—the most expensive work I ever auctioned and the most expensive work in auction history—bidding increments were intentionally disruptive and unpredictable, as several bidders vied to outwit one another. The pattern of cat-and-mouse bidding in small steps at the start of the chase was followed by an artillery of incredibly bold single bids of $10 million, $20million, and eventually $30 million. That pace, with the swift changes of increment, created one of the most extraordinary passages of competitive bidding ever witnessed at auction.

An auction is exhilarating. Do your homework, know your field, never be shy about seeking advice, attend the sale in person, plan to win, give it your best, and enjoy every moment.



from Artsy News https://ift.tt/CPILYBF

Monday, March 30, 2026

Matisse, Renoir, and Cézanne paintings are stolen during a heist at an Italian museum. https://ift.tt/z8IYcAX

On March 22nd, thieves broke into the Magnani Rocca Foundation outside of Parma, Italy, stealing works by Henri Matisse, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and Paul Cézanne. Italian officials confirmed the robbery on March 30th, as reported by the New York Times.

The stolen works included Renoir’s Les Poissons, an Impressionist painting of three fish on a platter; Cézanne’s Tasse et Plat ⁠de Cerises, a still life of a plate of cherries; and Matisse’s Odalisque on the Terrace, which portrays a nude woman playing the violin to a sleeping Sultan. The works are worth about €9 million ($10.34 million), according to the Italian public broadcaster Rai. This figure has yet to be confirmed by the police.

The Magnani Rocca Foundation was founded by Italian artist Luigi Magnani in 1977. The private art museum is housed in a 19th-century villa in Mamiano di Traversetolo, Italy. It opened to the public in 1990. Other artists featured in its collection include Titian, Francisco de Goya, Anthony van Dyck, and Claude Monet. The museum has remained open during the period following the robbery.

According to the police, the thieves broke into the building through the main entrance in the middle of the night, using a crowbar. The entire heist took around three minutes, and the thieves escaped by crossing the museum gardens. Italian news outlet La Repubblica reported that the thieves left a fourth artwork; however, the title of this work remains unreported.

This robbery is the latest in a string of high-profile museum heists across Europe. Most notably, thieves successfully broke into the Louvre in Paris this past October, making off with more than €88 million ($100.83 million) of jewelry. In January 2025, thieves deployed explosives to steal €4.3 million ($4.9 million) worth of gold artifacts from the Drents Museums in the Netherlands.

Interpol reported that similar heists have increased in recent years, citing how technological advancements make it easier to launder stolen property. “We’re in the smash and grab period, where criminals are taking sledgehammers and forcing their way through doors,” Christopher Marinello, a lawyer and the chief executive of Art Recovery International, told the Guardian. “You can break into anything in three minutes with a ski mask because the CCTV is going to capture what? Nothing.”



from Artsy News https://ift.tt/6lR7kt9

First permanent Ruth Asawa gallery to open in honor of artist’s centennial. https://ift.tt/kAtW15y

A new gallery dedicated to Ruth Asawa’s artworks will open in San Francisco this spring. Her family foundation, Ruth Asawa Lanier Inc. (RAL Inc.), announced that the gallery will be located within the Minnesota Street Project in the city’s Dogpatch neighborhood. The first show, which opens on May 9th, will be titled “Ruth Asawa: Untitled.”

Asawa is best known for her ethereal loop-wired sculptures, which use industrial wire to create suspended forms. Born in Norwalk, California in 1926, Asawa spent a large portion of her childhood in Japanese concentration camps during World War II. After briefly relocating to the Midwest, she attended Black Mountain College in North Carolina with Josef Albers. Asawa returned to California in 1949, establishing herself in San Francisco, where she lived and worked until her death in 2013 at 87.

“San Francisco was Asawa’s home for more than 60 years, during which time she developed a unique artistic language, raised her family, and became a leading advocate for the arts and art education both locally and nationally,” Henry Weverka, Asawa’s grandson and president of RAL Inc., told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Opening a permanent space here in her adopted hometown seems like a wonderful way to celebrate her centennial for many years to come.”

“Ruth Asawa: Untitled” refers to Asawa’s frequent practice of choosing not to give her sculptures names. The family told the Chronicle that the inaugural show will feature her signature wire sculptures alongside selections of her paperfolds, watercolors, and cast artworks. Looking ahead, the gallery space will mount rotating shows of Asawa’s works, often paired with works by close collaborators, such as Albers, Ray Johnson, Imogen Cunningham, and Anni Albers. Meanwhile, an annual exhibition will showcase artwork by students and faculty members of the Ruth Asawa San Francisco School of the Arts, which the artist co-founded in 1982.

Asawa’s work is currently the subject of a major traveling exhibition, “Ruth Asawa: Retrospective.” The show first opened at SFMOMA in April 2025, before being hosted by the Museum of Modern Art in New York from October 2025 to February 2026. The show is now on view at the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao through September 13th.



from Artsy News https://ift.tt/QvpNcjM

What Sold at Art Basel Hong Kong 2026 https://ift.tt/ckUM3C2

The 13th edition of Art Basel Hong Kong concluded on March 29, drawing over 91,500 visitors (1,500 more than the reported figure from 2025) across its five-day run at the Convention and Exhibition Centre. The record attendance underscored the city’s resilience as an art-market hub amid a complex geopolitical landscape.

This position was further cemented by a landmark five-year contract between Art Basel and the Hong Kong government, guaranteeing the fair’s exclusivity to the city within the region. Supported by a HK$150 million grant from the Mega Arts and Cultural Events Fund—the same body responsible for attracting major events like Coldplay and the Hong Kong Sevens to the city—the agreement marks the first time such a formal, long-term commitment has been signed since Art Basel’s first Hong Kong fair in 2013.

Beyond the fair venue, Hong Kong’s creative energy spilled into the streets thanks to an array of grassroots projects, standout shows, alternative art fairs, and assorted festivities.

Inside the convention center, 240 galleries from 41 countries and territories reported steady sales. Notably, the fair saw an increased presence of galleries from second-tier Chinese cities, while many prominent ones were granted prime booth locations. This strategic shift highlights Art Basel’s efforts to cultivate the untapped potential of collectors from across mainland China’s wider regions.


A 2025 report by the All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce estimates that over three million private enterprises in China will undergo intergenerational succession within the next decade. This shift is already manifesting in the art market.

These young collectors are widening their scope, pivoting toward female artists and supporting Asian and Asian diaspora creators across all mediums. Ink Studio, which recently opened a new space at Tai Kwun in central Hong Kong, described this edition as a “breakthrough moment.” Co-founder Craig Yee reported the sale of more than 19 works.

The emotional stakes of this new market were vividly captured on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. A post went viral—garnering thousands of likes and hundreds of comments—depicting a young woman collector in tears at the booth of Ingleby Gallery—one of Artsy’s best booths from the fair—after learning that Caroline Walker’s Dolls House (2026) had already been sold. The outpouring of comments underscored a passionate, visceral engagement with contemporary painting that transcends mere investment.

Blue-chip appetites also remained robust, with the leading transaction a €3.5 million ($4.02 million) Pablo Picasso work at BASTIAN. Dealers David Zwirner, Hauser & Wirth, and White Cube were among those reporting seven-figure sales.

Despite the high-profile sales at the top of the market, many exhibitors noted a shift in the speed of transactions compared to years past. “Interest from both private collectors and corporate clients remains very strong, albeit with a more measured pace of acquisitions this year,” observed Rosemarie Schwarzwälder, founder of Galerie nächst St. Stephan Rosemarie Schwarzwälder.

Schwarzwälder pointed out that the broader economic climate has inevitably begun to weigh on collector sentiment, leading to a more cautious approach to new acquisitions. However, she noted that the gallery’s presentation of works by Korean artist Jiyen Lee served as a significant standout in the fair’s Kabinett showcases, dedicated to solo artist presentations. Lee’s intricate works drew both intense visual engagement and steady sales, proving that even in a more cautious market, collectors remain willing to commit to artists with strong institutional and conceptual foundations.

Independent art advisor and auctioneer Elaine Kwok characterized Hong Kong’s market in 2026 as a year of “finally finding its footing,” rather than returning to the “go-go years” of unrestrained growth of the 2000s and 2010s.

According to Kwok, the current environment is rewarding longevity over opportunistic entry. “The galleries that tend to do well in the Asian market are the ones with outposts in the region, or at least with staff on the ground, building deep relationships throughout the year,” she observed. “You can’t expect to waltz into the fair once a year and expect collectors to buy; you need to invest in relationship-building all year round.”

Here, we round up the key sales reported by galleries at Art Basel Hong Kong 2026.

Top sales at Art Basel Hong Kong 2026

Snow White, 2006
Liu Ye
David Zwirner

David Zwirner led reported sales with a 2006 painting by Liu Ye, Snow White, which sold for $3.8 million. Other major placements from the gallery included:

BASTIAN sold Pablo Picasso’s Le peintre et son modèle (1964) for “approximately” €3.5 million ($4.02 million).

Perdu CCXXVII, 2026
Lee Bul
Hauser & Wirth

Garden, 2025-2026
Qiu Xiaofei
Hauser & Wirth

Hauser & Wirth led sales with two major works by Louise Bourgeois: À Baudelaire (#1) (2008) for $2.95 million and Couple (2002), which was placed with an Asian foundation for $2.2 million. Other highlights included:

  • George Condo’s Prismatic Head (2021) for $2.3 million.
  • Rashid Johnson’s mixed-media work Broken Soul “Gifts and Messages” (2025) for $750,000.
  • Avery Singer’s Chambers St. (v.2) (2026) for $575,000 to a private collector in Asia.
  • Qiu Xiaofei’s Garden (2025–2026) for $395,000 to an Asian private collection.
  • Flora Yukhnovich’s Be Walking Trees. Be Talking Beasts. (2026) for $325,000 to an Asian private collection.
  • Two works by Lee Bul: a 2026 wall work for $275,000 to an Asian museum, and a second work for $260,000 to an Asian private collector.

Waddington Custot’s sales were led by a work by Zao Wou-Ki with an asking price of $2.8 million and two works by Chu Teh-Chun for asking prices of $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

Deux Papillons sur un Vase Bleu, 1948
Fernand Léger
Cardi Gallery

La Torre, 1966
Giorgio de Chirico
Cardi Gallery

Cardi Gallery’s sales included Fernand Léger’s Deux Papillons sur un Vase Bleu (1948) for $1.8 million and Giorgio de Chirico’s La Torre (1966) for $800,000.

White Cube’s sales were led by Tracey Emin’s Take me to Heaven (2024), which sold for £1.2 million ($1.6 million). Other sales included:

  • Antony Gormley’s Plane (2025) for £500,000 ($665,000).
  • Mona Hatoum’s Still Life (medical cabinet) IV (2024) for £225,000 ($299,000).

Basketball #5, 1981
Elaine de Kooning
Berry Campbell Gallery

Thaddaeus Ropac’s sales were led by Martha Jungwirth’s Ohne Titel (2021), which sold for €460,000 ($530,000) to a Chinese institution. Additional sales included:

  • Megan Rooney’s The Reclining Sky (2025–26) for £280,000 ($372,000).
  • Oliver Beer’s Resonance Painting (The Air Around Us) (2026) for £55,000 ($73,000).
  • Heemin Chung’s Howling Blue (2025) for $24,000.

Berry Campbell Gallery’s sales were led by Lynne Drexler’s Multipile Moons (1973) for $425,000. Other sales included:

  • Alice Baber’s The Mountain Ladder to the Sea (1974) for $275,000.
  • Elaine de Kooning’s Basketball #5 (1981) for $100,000.
  • Additional unspecified works ranging in price from $25,000–$40,000 apiece.

More key sales at Art Basel Hong Kong 2026

Perrotin reported that approximately 70 percent of its booth sold on the first day, including two sold-out solo presentations and a Takashi Murakami work for $600,000–$800,000.

Sprüth Magers placed Anne Imhof’s Poppy Runner III (2025) with an Asian institution for €220,000 ($253,000). Other sales included:

  • Salvo’s Reykjavik (2009) for $135,000.
  • David Salle’s Untitled (2024) for $42,000.

Lehmann Maupin placed over 15 works in the $20,000–$400,000 range, featuring artists including Lee Bul, Do Ho Suh, and Mandy El-Sayegh.

Jessica Silverman’s sales included Judy Chicago’s Vicky’s Center (2023) for $165,000 and Atsushi Kaga’s Homage to Jakuchū - Panel 2 (2025) for $125,000.

Kukje Gallery’s sales included two paintings by Ha Chong-hyun for $180,000 each, a Pacita Abad trapunto work for a price in the range of $250,000–$300,000, and a work by Kim Tschang-Yeul for $40,000.

Taka Ishii Gallery sold Jade Fadojutimi’s That day she grieved for the life she never had (2026) for approximately £350,000 ($465,000).

Damaged Gene , 1998
Dinh Q. Lê
P.P.O.W

MASSIMODECARLO sold a painting by Yan Pei-Ming for €250,000–€350,000 ($287,000–$402,000) and a Danh Vō bronze cast for €200,000–€300,000 ($230,000–$345,000).

P•P•O•W sold seven works by Martin Wong, Dinh Q. Lê, Erin M. Riley, and Kyle Dunn for $600,000–$650,000 in total.


Additional sales at Art Basel Hong Kong 2026

Additional notable sales reported by galleries from the fair included:

Browse a selection of for-sale works from Art Basel Hong Kong 2026 galleries here.



from Artsy News https://ift.tt/KVnSb37

Pablo Picasso’s “Guernica” may leave Madrid for the first time in more than 30 years. https://ift.tt/ocD8E7k

Pablo Picasso ’s Guernica (1937), considered one of the Spanish artist’s masterpieces, might travel to the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao in 20...

Latest Post